Vol. 2 (2026)
Articles

Transforming Sustainable Construction Management Education through Artificial Intelligence: A Conceptual Pedagogical Framework for Chinese Higher Education

Yang Yi Fan
Faculty of Engineering & Quantity Surveying (FEQS), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Seremban, Malaysia
Khar Thoe Ng
Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts (FELA), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Seremban, Malaysia
Peng Jia Xin
Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts (FELA), INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Seremban, Malaysia

Published 2026-06-13

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence,
  • Digital pedagogy,
  • Sustainable construction education,
  • Educational innovation,
  • Construction management education,
  • Smart construction,
  • Chinese higher education
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Transforming Sustainable Construction Management Education through Artificial Intelligence: A Conceptual Pedagogical Framework for Chinese Higher Education . (2026). Journal of Teaching Innovation and Reform, 2, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.65638/2978-5634.2026.2.04

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionising teaching, curricula and the learning experience in higher education. In construction management education, the growth of sustainability, Building Information Modelling (BIM), digital twins and ‘smarter’ construction technologies necessitates that students be equipped to work effectively in Construction 4.0 environments. Little work has been done on how AI might facilitate pedagogic transformation and sustainable curriculum innovation in this sector, primarily in Chinese higher education.

This study used integrative literature review and conceptual framework development methodology. Relevant literature was obtained from Scopus, WoS, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink and Google Scholar, augmented with theoretical and policy literature where required. The results suggest that AI-enabled and digital construction technologies may facilitate personalised learning, experiential learning, sustainability competency, digital literacy, interdisciplinary capacity and problem-solving. Issues remain around digital readiness of educators, academic integrity, algorithmic bias, inequality of infrastructure and over-reliance on output of these systems. To this end, “Artificial Intelligence Supported Construction Pedagogy Framework” is proposed to bring together AI technologies, constructivist learning, sustainability pedagogy and Construction 4.0 competencies.

References

  1. Ahn, Y. H., Pearce, A. R., Wang, Y., & Wang, G. (2013). Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 4(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2012.759887
  2. Lee, S., Lee, J., & Ahn, Y. (2019). Sustainable BIM-based construction engineering education curriculum for practice-oriented training. Sustainability, 11(21), 6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216120
  3. Bower, M. (2017). Design of Technology-Enhanced Learning. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787141827
  4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  5. Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  6. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  7. Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of AI in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  8. Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  9. Khalil, M., et al. (2023). Exploring the potential and challenges of ChatGPT in higher education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 43.
  10. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. Prentice Hall.
  11. Zhuang, T., & Xu, X. (2018). “New Engineering Education” in Chinese higher education: Prospects and challenges. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 6(1), 69-109. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-6(1)-2018pp69-109
  12. Ministry of Education of China. (2018). Education Informatization 2.0 Action Plan.
  13. Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction, 122, 103517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517
  14. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.
  15. Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30-40.
  16. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  17. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
  18. UNEP. (2022). 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. United Nations Environment Programme.
  19. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO Publishing.
  20. Wang, P., Wu, P., Wang, J., Chi, H.-L., & Wang, X. (2018). A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061204
  21. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  22. Qi, S., Jiang, P., & Zhou, M. (2024). Enhancing sustainable development competence in undergraduates: Key determinants in the context of “dual-carbon” targets. Sustainability, 16(21), 9208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219208
  23. Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
  24. Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893-7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
  25. Zhang, N., Leong, W. Y., Zhang, T., & Wei, C. (2024). Artificial intelligence in engineering education: A review of pedagogical innovations. INTI Journal, 2024(46), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.202446
  26. Qiu, Y., Khan, M. H., Zhu, S., Chen, S., & Chan, C. (2024). Enhancing sustainability in academic guidance: Develop an AI-driven agent for Education 5.0. INTI Journal, 2024. https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.202440
  27. Yang, F., & Leong, W. Y. (2024). Application and challenges of BIM technology in China’s integrated utility tunnels. INTI Journal, 2024(41), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.202441
  28. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
  29. Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86, 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
  30. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner-instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
  31. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2023). Challenging the status quo and exploring the new boundaries in the age of algorithms: Reimagining the role of generative AI in distance education and online learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), i-viii.
  32. Wiek, A., Keeler, L., & Redman, C. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
  33. Lozano, R., Barreiro-Gen, M., Lozano, F. J., & Sammalisto, K. (2019). Teaching sustainability in European higher education institutions: Assessing the connections between competences and pedagogical approaches. Sustainability, 11(6), 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061602
  34. Huang, Y. (2018). A review of approaches and challenges of BIM education in construction management. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 12(6), 401-407. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2018.06.001
  35. Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Lee, H. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and assessment efforts (2019-2023). Computers and Education Open, 6, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100173
  36. Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., & Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114, 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179
  37. Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., Dripps, W., Habron, G., Harré, N., Jarchow, M., Losch, K., Michel, J., Mochizuki, Y., Rieckmann, M., Parnell, R., Walker, P., & Zint, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2
  38. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
  39. Chiu, T. K. F., Ahmad, Z., Ismailov, M., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171
  40. Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, 83, 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006
  41. Opoku, D.-G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., & Rashidi, M. (2021). Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 40, 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726
  42. Sacks, R., & Pikas, E. (2013). Building information modeling education for construction engineering and management. I: Industry requirements, state of the art, and gap analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11), 04013016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000759
  43. Sacks, R., Brilakis, I., Pikas, E., Xie, H. S., & Girolami, M. (2020). Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Centric Engineering, 1, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2020.16
  44. Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119287568
  45. UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/CGBA9153
  46. van der Heijden, J. (2023). Construction 4.0 in a narrow and broad sense: A systematic and comprehensive literature review. Building and Environment, 244, 110788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110788