Vol. 2 (2026)
Articles

Designing AI-Based Adaptive Learning Architectures for Inclusive and Culturally Responsive STEM Education

Wai Nwe Kyaw
INTI International University (IIU), Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Khar Thoe Ng
INTI International University (IIU), Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Published 2026-06-23

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence,
  • Inclusive education,
  • Culturally sustaining pedagogy,
  • Educational equity,
  • Educational Ecosystems

How to Cite

Designing AI-Based Adaptive Learning Architectures for Inclusive and Culturally Responsive STEM Education. (2026). Journal of Teaching Innovation and Reform, 2, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.65638/2978-5634.2026.2.09

Abstract

The utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is progressively revolutionizing pedagogical methodologies by providing adaptive, individualized, and easily accessible learning prospects for a wide range of learners. Nonetheless, numerous AI-driven educational frameworks persist in adhering to standardized methodologies that inadequately cater to issues of cultural diversity, fairness, and inclusivity. This article delves into the potential of AI-facilitated education in fostering the establishment of culturally sustaining and inclusive learning environments that bolster fair participation and meaningful learning encounters for all students. By drawing upon theories of inclusive education, culturally sustaining pedagogy, and technology-enhanced learning, this theoretical exposition advocates for a model that integrates AI technologies with culturally responsive and inclusive teaching strategies. The model accentuates features such as accessibility, provision of multilingual support, adaptive scaffolding, recognition of learner diversity, and student-centric engagement to preserve learners' cultural identities while advancing academic success and self-regulated learning. Moreover, the article delves into the functionalities of AI tools like intelligent tutoring systems, personalized feedback mechanisms, learning analytics, and speech recognition technologies in supporting students with varied linguistic, cultural, and educational requisites within inclusive educational settings. Furthermore, the research scrutinizes obstacles linked with the implementation of AI, encompassing issues of algorithmic partiality, digital disparity, ethical quandaries, and educator preparedness. It posits that efficacious AI-driven education necessitates cooperative efforts among educators, policymakers, communities, and technology innovators to ensure equitable and culturally responsive learning milieus. By proffering a culturally sustaining viewpoint on the amalgamation of AI and offering guidance for crafting future-proof inclusive educational frameworks rooted in diversity, accessibility, and social equity, this article enriches ongoing dialogues on inclusive and fair education.

References

  1. Aguayo, D., Good, M. W., Diem, S., Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2023). Promoting district-level culturally responsive practices. American Educational Research Journal, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X231161041
  2. Amin, M. R. M., Ismail, I., & Sivakumaran, V. M. (2025). Revolutionizing education with artificial intelligence (AI): Challenges and implications for open and distance learning (ODL). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101308
  3. Alkabbany, I., Ali, A. M., Foreman, C., et al. (2023). Real-time student engagement measurement in STEM classrooms using computer vision. Sensors, 23(3), 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031614
  4. Ayanwale, M. A., Idowu, K. O., Adelana, O. P., Shosanya, S. O., Falebita, O. S., & Adewale, K. A. (2025). Quantifying teachers' readiness for artificial intelligence adoption in education: A mathematical modeling perspective. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 26043. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08018-x
  5. Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain trustworthy artificial intelligence. Information Fusion, 99, 101805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805
  6. Anwar, A., Rehman, I. U., Nasralla, M. M., Khattak, S. B. A., & Khilji, N. (2023). Emotions matter: A systematic review and meta-analysis of students’ emotions in STEM online learning. Education Sciences, 13(9), 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090914
  7. Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9
  8. Casto, A. R. (2022). A re-envisioned multicultural STEM education for all. Education Sciences, 12(11), 792. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110792
  9. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821
  10. Chen, A.-X., & Jia, J.-Y. (2025). Does explainable artificial intelligence help enhance learning outcomes of adaptive learning? Modern Educational Technology, 34(10), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2024.10.010
  11. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2023). Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(4), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09409-w
  12. Cukurova, M., Giannakos, M., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2020). The promise and challenges of multimodal learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1441–1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13015
  13. Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada. https://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf
  14. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  15. Hariyanto, F. X. D., Kristianingsih, F. X. D., & Maharani, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in adaptive education: A systematic review of techniques for personalised learning. Discover Education, 4, 458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00908-6
  16. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In C. Stückelberger & P. Duggal (Eds.), Data ethics: Building trust: How digital technologies can serve humanity (pp. 621–653). Globethics Publications. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
  17. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://circls.org/primers/artificial-intelligence-in-education-promises-and-implications-for-teaching-and-learning/
  18. Hughes, L., Malik, T., Dettmer, S., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Reimagining higher education: Navigating the challenges of generative AI adoption. Information Systems Frontiers. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10582-6
  19. Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y.-S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074
  20. King, N. S., Peña-Telfer, L., & Earls, S. (2023). “The work I do matters”: Cultivating a STEM counterspace for Black girls through culturally sustaining pedagogy. Education Sciences, 13(7), 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070754
  21. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
  22. Lal, P. (2024). Towards equitable learning: Exploring artificial intelligence in inclusive education. International Journal of Law, Management and Humanities, 7(5), 416–434. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118279
  23. Li, Y., & Lu, B. (2025). Intelligent educational systems based on adaptive learning algorithms and multimodal behavior modeling. PeerJ Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3157
  24. Luo, J., Zheng, C., Yin, J., & Teo, H. H. (2025). Design and assessment of AI-based learning tools in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00540-2
  25. Lee, C. D. (2017). Integrating research on how people learn and learning across settings as a window of opportunity to address inequality in educational processes and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16689046
  26. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
  27. Ma, J., Johnson, E. A., & McCrory, B. (2023). Understanding learning engagement with user-centred human-computer interaction in a multimodal online learning environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 67(1), 2018–2023.
  28. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
  29. Mejeh, M., & Rehm, M. (2024). Taking adaptive learning in educational settings to the next level: Leveraging natural language processing for improved personalization. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1597–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10345-1
  30. Mohammad, S. I., Yogeesh, N., Raja, N., William, P., Ramesha, M. S., & Vasudevan, A. (2025). Integrating AI and fuzzy systems to enhance education equity. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 19(2), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/190215
  31. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://files.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/6105/files/2019/01/SAFIYA-NOBLE.pdf
  32. Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2014). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 686–706). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.041
  33. Ouhaichi, H., Spikol, D., & Vogel, B. (2023). Research trends in multimodal learning analytics: A systematic mapping study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100136
  34. Ouhaichi, H., Vogel, B., & Spikol, D. (2024). Exploring design considerations for multimodal learning analytics systems: An interview study. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1356537
  35. Prentzas, J., & Binopoulou, A. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence approaches in education: A systematic review. Electronics, 14(11), 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112279
  36. Rachha, A., & Seyam, M. (2023). Explainable AI in education: Current trends, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE SoutheastCon 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/SoutheastCon51012.2023.10115140
  37. Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
  38. Ren, X., & Wu, M. L. (2025). Examining teaching competencies and challenges while integrating artificial intelligence in higher education. TechTrends, 69(3), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01055-3
  39. Samuel, Y., Brennan-Tonetta, M., Samuel, J., Kashyap, R., Kumar, V., Kaashyap, S. K., Chidipothu, N., Anand, I., & Jain, P. (2023). Cultivation of human-centered artificial intelligence: Culturally adaptive thinking in education (CATE) for AI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1198180. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1198180
  40. Smith, T., Avraamidou, L., & Adams, J. D. (2022). Culturally relevant/responsive pedagogies in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17, 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10082-4
  41. Shi, L. (2025). Assessing teachers' generative artificial intelligence competencies: Instrument development and validation. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 23365–23384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13684-5
  42. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  43. Villegas-Ch, W., Gutierrez, R., García-Ortiz, J., & Guevara, V. (2025). Explainable educational assistant integrated in Moodle: Automated semantic assessment and adaptive tutoring using NLP and XAI. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, 191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00438-y
  44. Wang, X., Huang, R. T., Sommer, M., Pei, B., Shidfar, P., Rehman, M. S., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Martin, F. (2025). The efficacy of artificial intelligence-enabled adaptive learning systems on learner outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241240459
  45. Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
  46. Wu, T.-T., Lee, H.-Y., Wang, W.-S., Lin, C.-J., & Huang, Y.-M. (2023). Leveraging computer vision for adaptive learning in STEM education: Effect of engagement and self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00422-5
  47. Xie, J., & Ferguson, Y. (2022). STEM faculty’s perspectives on adopting culturally responsive pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(5), 1215–1233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2129960
  48. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  49. Zhang, J. (2025). Ethics of artificial intelligence in education: Balancing automation and human-centred learning. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 10(1), 2025. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0843
  50. Zhu, H., Sun, Y., & Yang, J. (2025). Towards responsible artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review on identifying and mitigating ethical risks. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 1111. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05252-6